![]() ![]() David Schneider testified that he has remarried and that his wife is expecting a baby. was six years old, based upon changes in his circumstances that would permit him to care for her full-time. ♤ David Schneider moved to terminate the guardianship proceeding in 1995, when M. The order appointing guardians specifically stated that none of the parties was found unfit to care for M., and that it was in her best interests for the Navejars to be appointed guardians. David Schneider was given liberal visitation and was directed to pay child support and medical expenses. ♣ David Schneider testified that he agreed to the guardianship because at that time he was single and was on call 24-hours per day, seven days a week, with his job and was therefore unable to care for M. The guardians, Roy and Kay Navejar, are not related to M. David obtained a divorce from Brenda and was awarded custody of M. Shortly after M.'s birth, Brenda Schneider abandoned David and M. is the daughter of David and Brenda Schneider. ♡ The issue before us is the standard of proof required in a proceeding to terminate the guardianship of a minor under Frazier, Tulsa, Oklahoma, For Minor Child. Hamor, Tulsa, Oklahoma, For Appellees, Roy and Kay Navejar. Sharon Womack Doty, Tulsa, Oklahoma, For Appellant, David L. ![]() ♠ Natural father of a six-year-old daughter moved to terminate her guardianship pursuant toĬERTIORARI GRANTED PREVIOUSLY OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS IS VACATED THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER IS REVERSED AND THE CAUSE IS REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO ENTER AN ORDER IN CONFORMANCE WITH THIS OPINION. SCHNEIDER, natural father, Appellant,ĬERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS DIVISION I IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF: M.R.S., a minor child,ĭAVID L.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |